We are sitting at a fascinating junction in the history of work. In order for this transformation to work well, nothing less than a revolution in management practices must happen. Thomson states that the main issues pushing this tsunami of change are flexible/smart working and increasing demand for work/life balance and job satisfaction. The difference is that the current revolution is bringing as much change in a decade as was spread over a century last time. Today we are in the middle of the Information Revolution, facing fundamental changes to the way we live and work. Organizations are still run as hierarchical command systems in a world of networked individuals and self-employed entrepreneurs. The marginal cost of $30 exceeds the new market wage of $20 because the monopsonist must also pay its two current employees an hourly wage that is $5 higher than before.Peter Thomson argues that firms are still applying Industrial Age working practices to the new Information Age work patterns. Hence, the monopsonist's costs from hiring the third worker are $60 (3 × $20), and the marginal cost from hiring the third worker is $30 ($60 − $30). However, because the monopsonist cannot discriminate among its workers (and risk alienating them), it must offer the higher $20 wage to its two current employees. In order to attract the third worker, the monopsonist must offer an hourly wage of $20 instead of $15. Suppose the monopsonist wants to increase the number of workers that it hires from 2 to 3. The fourth column reports the marginal cost of labor, which is the change in monopsonist's total cost of labor as it hires additional workers. The third column reports the total cost to the monopsonist of hiring each worker, which is just the wage times the number of workers. The first two columns provide data on the market supply of labor that the monopsonist faces. The monopsonist's marginal cost of hiring an additional worker, therefore, will not be equal to the wage paid to that worker because the monopsonist will have to increase the wage that it pays to all of its workers.Ī numerical example of a monopsony market is provided in Table. If the monopsonist wants to increase the number of workers that it hires, it must increase the wage that it pays to all of its workers, including those whom it currently employs. The monopsonist faces the upward‐sloping market supply curve it is a wage‐searcher rather than a wage‐taker. Unlike a firm operating in a perfectly competitive labor market, the monopsonist does not simply hire all the workers that it wants at the equilibrium market wage. The supply of labor that the monopsonist faces is the market supply of labor. Because the monopsonist is the sole de‐mander of labor in the market, the monopsonist's demand for labor is the market demand for labor. An example of a monopsony would be the only firm in a “company town,” where the workers all work for that single firm. The single firm in the market is referred to as the monopsonist. Labor Demand and Supply in a Perfectly Competitive MarketĪ labor market in which there is only one firm demanding labor is called a monopsony.Equilibrium in a Perfectly Competitive Market.Monopolistic Competition in the Long-run.Demand in a Perfectly Competitive Market.Classical and Keynesian Theories: Output, Employment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |